A goal was to minimise the conditions needed to reproduce a binary.
.buildinfo files (“buildinfo files”) would be a formula to reproduce a build. It should be small as possible.
They don’t/can’t describe every possible input; [a] build process [can be] affected by obscure things or external, variable factors.
buildinfo files: record inputs to the build that produced the output, so that you can recreate its state.
analysis of buildinfo and outputs: as more builders provide buildinfo files, we can look for intersections (reproducible binaries), and causes of any differences (non-reproducibility)
the ideal (reproducible) build would depend only the source code and build dependencies
buildinfo files should:
- contain the minimal information needed to produce a given binary
- be small, compact, and easily distributable
buildinfo files might contain:
- source package (name, version, hash?)
- binaries produced (name, arch, checksums)
- build dependencies (recursively)
- build path (until recently?)
- environment variables (since recently?)
In Debian, buildinfo is a separate file.
In Arch Linux, buildinfo is included in the package files (but signatures are detached).
Consuming and aggregating buildinfo files:
in Debian, buildinfo files are used when:
- DD uploads a package
- debian-ftp system distributes packages
- end-user installs packages
and now we also realised:
- buildinfo distributors
We want to collate and distribute buildinfo files from external parties too; not just those from Debian developers and the official builds.
Collecting and distributing those, is a quite different task than just distributing buildinfo from Debian’s official builds.
buildinfo.debian.net already collects and distributes some non-official buildinfo files.
We will need to write tools making it easy to test [reproducibility] and submit buildinfo, and tools to retrieve buildinfo files/signatures when installing.
Signed buildinfos save people from having to build every package themselves: it gives them sufficient confidence to trust pre-built binaries.
buildinfo files should to be detailed enough to explain the causes of non-reproducibility; but too much information ($HOME, hostname, installed packaged versions)
An argument arose that a normalised build environment avoids lots of reproducibility issues, like build path, environment, etc., affecting the build. Whilst that would be easier, some of us think that is really a bug in the software that ought to be fixed.
In the extreme case, when a build-dependency affects an output binary, we may need to generate a new set of buildinfo files describing that situation.
Follow us on Twitter @ReproBuilds, Mastodon @email@example.com & Reddit and please consider making a donation. • Content licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0, style licensed under MIT. Templates and styles based on the Tor Styleguide. Logos and trademarks belong to their respective owners. • Patches welcome via our Git repository (instructions) or via our mailing list. • Full contact info